Preface: I am so sorry for the families of the victims in this latest shooting in California and the families of the victims in all the attacks that proceeded it. My heart aches for you. I cannot imagine your pain. You have my deepest sympathy.
Dear America,
Hi. I'm going to be visiting the United States soon, so could you maybe lay-off the mass shootings until I'm gone?
Yea, I know: I'm one of you. Born and raised in America and lived there most of my life. The thing is that for the past few years I've been living abroad in countries that are much safer than the United States and I have grown accustomed to that.
I've gotten used to living in the UK and Singapore which both have very strict gun laws. These countries also have far less violence per-capita than the United States. There is probably a direct correlation there. That doesn't matter because facts, figures, and analysis aren't things that Americans like to do when talking about guns. So that's fine, I'll let that go.
See: Annual murder rate per 100,000 people (from Wikipedia)
Singapore: 0.3
United Kingdon: 1.2
United States: 4.8
Oops, sorry, facts and figures there. I'll move on.
But recognize that I actually am safer at my homes-away-from-home than I am at my home-at-home.
So, America, if you would be so kind, please just lay-off the mass killings for the month of June. I know I can't change your opinions or take away your guns, so I won't try. I'm just asking you to chill for a few weeks while I'm around.
Once I'm safely back on the other side of the Pacific then knock yourself out (and each other). I know you will. Hell, if you haven't changed anything after Columbine and Aurora and Sandy Hook then there's no reason to think you will change anything now. Whatever. I guess freedom means that crazy Americans get to kill a few other Americans from time to time. If that's what America wants (and clearly it is) then that's what America gets. Personally, if it were up to me, I would maybe try and change something. But it isn't really up to me. All I can do is vote, yell, and write offensive blogs. I also don't want to get the crazy Americans pissed off at me personally because I'm unarmed--I've been living for three years in countries with strict gun laws.
Who knows, maybe after a month you'll realize that not-randomly-killing-people isn't all that bad. Maybe you'll want to continue even after I've returned home. Maybe you could go for two months without any mass murders. But that's up to you. I can't make that decision for you.
So keep your guns. Just please lock them up while I'm visiting.
Let me come and go in peace.
Kind regards,
Peter
PS: To the responsible gun owners who may have said something like "I wish I'd been there with my gun because there would have been a lot fewer victims." I ask if you are trained to handle that type of situation, and I sincerely hope you are. I'm not sure "Hero-with-gun stops Villain-with-gun" plays out as cleanly and succinctly in real life as it does in your head or in the movies. Even if you are completely successful in stopping the Villain's rampage; at that point you then become a person with a gun in public who has just taken a human life. I hope "Hero#2-with-a-gun" who was standing 30ft away can correctly assess the situation and recognizes you as Hero#1 and not Villain#2. I also hope you don't miss the villain and hit something or someone you didn't intend to hit. And I hope that nothing else goes wrong, because things can always go wrong. Even if you happen to be the most feared American sniper in Iraq things can still go wrong.
Let me come and go in peace.
Sunday, May 25, 2014
Monday, May 19, 2014
A new Resolution (?)
If the iPhone 6 brings out another screen resolution (as much of the current speculation thinks it will) that may further highlight just how many Apps have been abandoned.
For my company, there will be a select couple of apps that we would update for release--or try to get updated in time for release as long as it can fit with our other work schedules because none of us are full-time anymore.
Certainly FTP on the Go (Standard, Pro, Pro-Upgrade) would get updated quickly. But that is not a graphics based app. It's all windows and pages that will resize automatically. It will probably just need the new icons for the app and toolbars. Easy.
ContactClean (Free and Pro) will get an update, but these are also not graphic-based, so would be quick and easy to do. These also typically get a sales boost when new phones are released.
The games are not so easy and will get through eventually. At least the ones that sell reasonably well.
World1-1 will just scale-up since it's 8-bit pixel art to begin with. That's helpful.
Poker Apps (Holdem, Holdem-Free, Omaha, All-In) would probably get done next, but would mean exporting a lot of card and chip graphics for all the new sizes, which is time consuming and boring but not very hard. The source graphics are all either vector or plenty big thanks to retina iPad so there won't be problems with the sources not living up to the challenge. The exception would be some of the card protectors, which may just have to scale up and people live with it.
Not sure what gets done after that, if anything. Pawn'd? Bloc'd & Bloc3d? Knife Dancing?
Any game that uses non-vector stock art may take longer if it gets done at all since those can be harder to scale-up depending on the source.
If I had to guess: if only the top 1000-2000 apps overall (0.05% - 0.15%) got the update to fully support the new resolution then most people wouldn't notice or care that the rest haven't as long as they scale up and don't look to pixelated.
And Apple better make things work pretty good in the new resolution because there are going to be a lot of apps that will not get updated.
Apple's press will talk about the mad-dash to update apps just like ios7. And how many thousand get there before release day. They won't mention the million+ apps that won't get there by release day and probably won't get there ever.
Finally, as I said when retina first started going into devices, if we have to include different graphics sets for @1x, @2x, @3x(?), HD, HD@2x, and HD@3x(?) then that's a lot of excess baggage since any one device will only use a single graphic set.
For my company, there will be a select couple of apps that we would update for release--or try to get updated in time for release as long as it can fit with our other work schedules because none of us are full-time anymore.
Certainly FTP on the Go (Standard, Pro, Pro-Upgrade) would get updated quickly. But that is not a graphics based app. It's all windows and pages that will resize automatically. It will probably just need the new icons for the app and toolbars. Easy.
ContactClean (Free and Pro) will get an update, but these are also not graphic-based, so would be quick and easy to do. These also typically get a sales boost when new phones are released.
The games are not so easy and will get through eventually. At least the ones that sell reasonably well.
World1-1 will just scale-up since it's 8-bit pixel art to begin with. That's helpful.
Poker Apps (Holdem, Holdem-Free, Omaha, All-In) would probably get done next, but would mean exporting a lot of card and chip graphics for all the new sizes, which is time consuming and boring but not very hard. The source graphics are all either vector or plenty big thanks to retina iPad so there won't be problems with the sources not living up to the challenge. The exception would be some of the card protectors, which may just have to scale up and people live with it.
Not sure what gets done after that, if anything. Pawn'd? Bloc'd & Bloc3d? Knife Dancing?
Any game that uses non-vector stock art may take longer if it gets done at all since those can be harder to scale-up depending on the source.
If I had to guess: if only the top 1000-2000 apps overall (0.05% - 0.15%) got the update to fully support the new resolution then most people wouldn't notice or care that the rest haven't as long as they scale up and don't look to pixelated.
And Apple better make things work pretty good in the new resolution because there are going to be a lot of apps that will not get updated.
Apple's press will talk about the mad-dash to update apps just like ios7. And how many thousand get there before release day. They won't mention the million+ apps that won't get there by release day and probably won't get there ever.
Finally, as I said when retina first started going into devices, if we have to include different graphics sets for @1x, @2x, @3x(?), HD, HD@2x, and HD@3x(?) then that's a lot of excess baggage since any one device will only use a single graphic set.
Monday, May 12, 2014
Surviving (or not) in the Apple AppStore Now That the Party is Over
The bulk of this article was written back in December but I never posted it. Things have gotten worse. Where the article says "We may have to shift to part time..." we already have. "We have a couple ideas that could still hit..." they haven't.
Also the 58 apps number may be slightly inaccurate. we've released new ones since then, but also removed some of our crap because we didn't want potential employers finding our old garbage apps instead of the good ones when checking into our work. (FYI: we only removed them from sale in the USA; not worldwide. The "no reason to clean up after yourself" section below still holds true.)
December 2013:
-------
Yes, you heard that right: The AppStore party is over.
Or, more specifically, there are a happy handful of apps are making millions of dollars and hiding the millions of apps making a handful of dollars.
The company I work for--that my brother founded--has been in business since 1997. We have 58 apps in the AppStore. We've won awards and been featured in magazines and books. And now we may have to shift to part-time or side-project and get other jobs soon. That sucks. (We have a couple ideas that could still hit. Hopefully! But if they don't...that sucks.) And a lot of the problems are things that we are powerless to fix. And that sucks.
"Millions of Apps!"
As more and more apps flood into the AppStore it becomes harder and harder for smaller, independently developed, or niche apps to get noticed at all. If you don't get noticed, you don't get sales. Now it is just a question of whether Apple decides to feature you or if you get written up in one of the big tech blogs. If you don't...you're screwed.
They want their big number to stay bigger than Google's big number and Microsoft's big number. The percentage of dead apps doesn't matter as long as they stay in the pile.
Apps vs. Music
One of the main systemic problems with the AppStore is that it grew out of a music store. Music works very differently than software. As music gets old it may become less popular, but it never becomes obsolete. There are people in the world that are listening to Mozart, or Sgt. Pepper's, or London Calling, or OK Computer (or...hell, why not: New Kids on the Block) for the first time today and enjoying that music just as much as the people who listened to those songs when they were new. But no one is loading up Asteroids, or VisiCalc, or Doom, or Word 2.0 and feeling the same way people did when those pieces of software were new. Software doesn't work that way. You may feel nostalgia, but you won't feel mind-melting awe.
Which means that developers need to constantly update their software in order to keep it relevant. A band never needs to go back and re-record an album because studio technology has improved and the recording would sound better. And if a band did decide to do that, they would not give away the 'new' album free to everyone who bought the first edition. The recording quality of a Louis Armstrong album is not going to be as good as a teen-pop album recorded today. But that doesn't matter because the quality of the music can be appreciated separately from the quality of the recording. Software does not have that luxury.
Once a developer pays their annual fee to list something in the AppStore, they can list as many things as they want. And there is no incentive to ever take something down. Even if it's old, obsolete, and the developer has no desire to ever update it.
Let's say a developer has an old app that sold reasonably well in the past, but has had its run and isn't selling much anymore. And the developer has moved on to other Apps. However, let's say this old app still makes about $6 per month. Well, when your choice is $6 per month or $0 per month and you don't have to do anything either way... You take the $6.
"Give it Away Give it Away Give it Away Now."
Apple's "Free Upgrades Forever" policy doesn't help. It basically turns the App Store into a collection of 1-off programs that may get an update or two to boost sales early on, but eventually will be abandoned because every time someone buys your app, they are taken out of the pool of potential customers who could buy your app again. The idea that it's easier to keep an existing customer than to find a new one goes out the window because once they are a customer, they can't buy the same thing again. That's a tricky concept, so I'll explain it better.
This further sucks because none of the good reviews for Version 1 will transfer over to Version 2.
There is no way to offer version 2 as a paid-upgrade to version 1 but contained in the same app package and give people the choice not to upgrade if they don't want to pay again. (Games can do this to some degree by adding level-packs or things like that, but that is hard to do with utility software.)
There is no way to offer different price points for iPhone or iPad without (again) breaking things out into separate apps.
There is no official way to offer discounted pricing for upgrades. Although WE DID FIGURE OUT HOW TO DO THIS but doing so further fragmented our core app.
Cheap. Cheap. Cheap.
Most apps in the AppStore are free or $0.99. It's rare that an app can charge more than $5 and extremely rare for an app to charge more than $10. Desktop games can cost from $10 to $60. Desktop productivity software can cost hundreds or thousands of dollars. For the most part, mobile software costs 99 cents or free. You have to sell a lot of copies to make any money from 99 cents per pop. So niche software is out. And people are so used to the cheap prices that no one is willing to pay more than that. So niche software is out again. In fact, it's even tough to pry 99 cents out of people's hands. That is why so much has shifted to free with in-app purchase because people can see if they like something. But Apple limits so much of what can be done in this way because they won't let an app 'expire' after a time limit, and they prohibit many of the traditional 'shareware' methods of convincing people to pay after they've gotten a taste of what your app has to offer.
---------
That's where the December 2013 writing ended. I never finished it. So it just sort of gets cut off in the middle of a thought. But that's how I feel right now--cut off in the middle of something good.
Our business has no shortage of new ideas for products, new ideas for improvements to the existing catalog, or new things to do. We just can't do any of them because no one is buying what we are selling anymore. And they aren't buying the competitors' products either, so we don't know what we could be doing better.
Back in the 'good old days' which was 2008-2010 if an app 'failed' it would still probably make a few thousand bucks over a year or so and you could at least cover a chunk of your time. Now if an app fails, you're lucky to make $100. Some of our recent releases haven't hit $50 yet.
One more thing...
Tech support:
Developers have no way of knowing if an email is coming from a customer or a pirate. Imagine stealing a car off a dealer's lot then turning around and driving it into their service center to collect on the warranty. That happens here.
Also the 58 apps number may be slightly inaccurate. we've released new ones since then, but also removed some of our crap because we didn't want potential employers finding our old garbage apps instead of the good ones when checking into our work. (FYI: we only removed them from sale in the USA; not worldwide. The "no reason to clean up after yourself" section below still holds true.)
December 2013:
-------
Yes, you heard that right: The AppStore party is over.
Or, more specifically, there are a happy handful of apps are making millions of dollars and hiding the millions of apps making a handful of dollars.
The company I work for--that my brother founded--has been in business since 1997. We have 58 apps in the AppStore. We've won awards and been featured in magazines and books. And now we may have to shift to part-time or side-project and get other jobs soon. That sucks. (We have a couple ideas that could still hit. Hopefully! But if they don't...that sucks.) And a lot of the problems are things that we are powerless to fix. And that sucks.
"Millions of Apps!"
As more and more apps flood into the AppStore it becomes harder and harder for smaller, independently developed, or niche apps to get noticed at all. If you don't get noticed, you don't get sales. Now it is just a question of whether Apple decides to feature you or if you get written up in one of the big tech blogs. If you don't...you're screwed.
That brilliant App idea you had? Someone's done it already. And even if yours is better it's likely that no one will notice. And why should anyone pay for yours when there's a crappy one for free. Yes, in 2009 you may have gotten rich off that idea. Today, it may buy you a cup of coffee.This issue is exacerbated by some systemic problems with the AppStore itself. Problems that at present, Apple probably won't fix. In fact, Apple has almost no interest in fixing them. Because Apple likes to strut out the big numbers--the big number at the top is all that matters to Apple. They like the fact that (as of this writing) there are over 1 million apps in the US AppStore and almost 1.5 million worldwide. The other fact that at least 80% of those apps (800,000 - 1.2mil of them) have almost no sales and have probably been abandoned by their developers is of no concern to Apple. Those apps still count toward the impressive sounding total.
They want their big number to stay bigger than Google's big number and Microsoft's big number. The percentage of dead apps doesn't matter as long as they stay in the pile.
Apps vs. Music
One of the main systemic problems with the AppStore is that it grew out of a music store. Music works very differently than software. As music gets old it may become less popular, but it never becomes obsolete. There are people in the world that are listening to Mozart, or Sgt. Pepper's, or London Calling, or OK Computer (or...hell, why not: New Kids on the Block) for the first time today and enjoying that music just as much as the people who listened to those songs when they were new. But no one is loading up Asteroids, or VisiCalc, or Doom, or Word 2.0 and feeling the same way people did when those pieces of software were new. Software doesn't work that way. You may feel nostalgia, but you won't feel mind-melting awe.
Vinyl records: YES. 5.25" floppy disks: NO.Software doesn't age well. Particularly utility or productivity software does not age well. People may occasionally feel nostalgic for an old video game, but no one loads up Word 2.0 or WordPerfect on MS-DOS when they have a document they need to get done for their business.
Which means that developers need to constantly update their software in order to keep it relevant. A band never needs to go back and re-record an album because studio technology has improved and the recording would sound better. And if a band did decide to do that, they would not give away the 'new' album free to everyone who bought the first edition. The recording quality of a Louis Armstrong album is not going to be as good as a teen-pop album recorded today. But that doesn't matter because the quality of the music can be appreciated separately from the quality of the recording. Software does not have that luxury.
Old albums become back-catalogue. Old software just becomes obsolete.No Incentive to Clean Up After Yourself.
Once a developer pays their annual fee to list something in the AppStore, they can list as many things as they want. And there is no incentive to ever take something down. Even if it's old, obsolete, and the developer has no desire to ever update it.
Let's say a developer has an old app that sold reasonably well in the past, but has had its run and isn't selling much anymore. And the developer has moved on to other Apps. However, let's say this old app still makes about $6 per month. Well, when your choice is $6 per month or $0 per month and you don't have to do anything either way... You take the $6.
Yes, it's crap. No, it doesn't support iPhone5. Yea, it probably crashes on iOS7 (I don't know, I haven't installed the thing in years.) It may not even support retina displays, I can't remember. If someone emails about it, I just delete the email. I have more important things to worry about. Whatever, $6 per month is still better than nothing.This problem could be solved by requiring some nominal yearly fee per app. Except Apple would never do that because developers would immediately take down all of their apps that aren't making any money. This actually would be fantastic for the apps that remain, but Apple's marketing would have to change from "MILLIONS OF APPS!" to "200,000 Apps....but they're the good ones that you'll like."
"Give it Away Give it Away Give it Away Now."
Apple's "Free Upgrades Forever" policy doesn't help. It basically turns the App Store into a collection of 1-off programs that may get an update or two to boost sales early on, but eventually will be abandoned because every time someone buys your app, they are taken out of the pool of potential customers who could buy your app again. The idea that it's easier to keep an existing customer than to find a new one goes out the window because once they are a customer, they can't buy the same thing again. That's a tricky concept, so I'll explain it better.
Suppose you design "Cool App version 1" and sell a million copies.The obvious choice is to release it as a separate app. You gotta stay in business, right? But you also can't take down Version 1 because then you would lose the ability to make any bug fixes to that version. You then run into the problem that some new customers may find Version 1 without realizing Version 2 exists. Once they install V1, they'll likely see the notice you put inside the V1 app saying "Be sure to download the new Version 2!"
That's fantastic!
Then you work for a year on version 2. To be clear, version 2 is not a sequel, it is the same app just with added functionality, new features, some design improvements, and updated graphics...
If you release version 2 as a (free) upgrade to version 1, then you get 1 million happy users and $0.
If you release it as a separate app, then you get 1 million disappointed users. But some of them will buy the new app.
This further sucks because none of the good reviews for Version 1 will transfer over to Version 2.
There is no way to offer version 2 as a paid-upgrade to version 1 but contained in the same app package and give people the choice not to upgrade if they don't want to pay again. (Games can do this to some degree by adding level-packs or things like that, but that is hard to do with utility software.)
There is no way to offer different price points for iPhone or iPad without (again) breaking things out into separate apps.
There is no official way to offer discounted pricing for upgrades. Although WE DID FIGURE OUT HOW TO DO THIS but doing so further fragmented our core app.
Cheap. Cheap. Cheap.
Most apps in the AppStore are free or $0.99. It's rare that an app can charge more than $5 and extremely rare for an app to charge more than $10. Desktop games can cost from $10 to $60. Desktop productivity software can cost hundreds or thousands of dollars. For the most part, mobile software costs 99 cents or free. You have to sell a lot of copies to make any money from 99 cents per pop. So niche software is out. And people are so used to the cheap prices that no one is willing to pay more than that. So niche software is out again. In fact, it's even tough to pry 99 cents out of people's hands. That is why so much has shifted to free with in-app purchase because people can see if they like something. But Apple limits so much of what can be done in this way because they won't let an app 'expire' after a time limit, and they prohibit many of the traditional 'shareware' methods of convincing people to pay after they've gotten a taste of what your app has to offer.
---------
That's where the December 2013 writing ended. I never finished it. So it just sort of gets cut off in the middle of a thought. But that's how I feel right now--cut off in the middle of something good.
Our business has no shortage of new ideas for products, new ideas for improvements to the existing catalog, or new things to do. We just can't do any of them because no one is buying what we are selling anymore. And they aren't buying the competitors' products either, so we don't know what we could be doing better.
Back in the 'good old days' which was 2008-2010 if an app 'failed' it would still probably make a few thousand bucks over a year or so and you could at least cover a chunk of your time. Now if an app fails, you're lucky to make $100. Some of our recent releases haven't hit $50 yet.
One more thing...
Tech support:
Developers have no way of knowing if an email is coming from a customer or a pirate. Imagine stealing a car off a dealer's lot then turning around and driving it into their service center to collect on the warranty. That happens here.
Sunday, May 11, 2014
The Sad State of iOS App Undiscoverability
Read Michael's Blog Post about this.
The long-tail has been cut off.
The long-tail has been cut off.
The Sad State of Paid iOS Apps
Here are two charts. They track the chart position and daily sales of our poker game Heads Up: Hold'em for the past three months (Feb-May 2014). We have a few variations on this game, but the charts show the original Paid-App version for iPhone (non-universal app).
The top line graph shows chart position. This actually shows the average of Casino Games and Card Games. Generally Casino Games chart rankings are slightly higher and Card Games are slightly lower, but the average position between the two works fine for these purposes. The top position on April 6 shows as #43 on the charts which is the average of #37 (casino) and #50 (card).
The lower bar graph is the daily sales numbers. Sadly, these are not per-100 or per-1000. This game has been selling between 0 and 7 copies a day for the past three months. I've overlaid the chart position line, so you can see the two graphs do line up fairly well.
And now to the sad state of things:
If an app sells only 7 copies per day (earning the developer ~$4.85 if it is a .99 app as this is) it can comfortably live in the top 50 on the paid app charts for Card Games and/or Casino Games. And all the apps on the charts in positions lower than 50 in these categories are selling LESS THAN 7 COPIES PER DAY. And there are thousands upon thousands of card game and casino game apps that are not on the charts at all and haven't been for months/years. Those apps are selling nothing. Absolutely nothing.
Recently (May 8, 2014), our Home Poker Tournament Timer (that works great but has not been updated in a long time and does not even support retina display.) popped onto the Card Game charts at #161. It sold 1 copy that day. It had sold 1 copy per day for 4 of the previous 5 days, which may have built up some 'momentum' if you can call it that.
Apple is going to trot out big numbers about how many billions of dollars developers are being paid. That may be true if you're part of the CandyBirdZombieClan, but it isn't the case for the rest of us. The truth is that people aren't buying apps anymore. If you've been using your iPhone and iPad for more than a few years, you already have everything you need.
Here's something to think about: In the past 12 months, have you spent more or less money on apps than the previous 12 months? And how about the 12 months before that? If you didn't buy some big-ticket item (Sat.Nav. etc) then you probably spend less and less on Apps each year you own an iOS device. That is true for EVERYONE! And most everyone who wants an iOS device has already had one for several years.
Apple gets to sell you a shiny new phone every year or two, but the 'free App updates forever' policy means we only get to sell you our shiny new App once ever.
I wonder what would happen if you didn't count the 200 apps on the 'top grossing' list in the 'big number' of how much App Developers were earning. Take out those 200 and the pile is a lot smaller for the other million of us.
It sucks to be one of the 99% of App Developers right now. It really does suck.
The top line graph shows chart position. This actually shows the average of Casino Games and Card Games. Generally Casino Games chart rankings are slightly higher and Card Games are slightly lower, but the average position between the two works fine for these purposes. The top position on April 6 shows as #43 on the charts which is the average of #37 (casino) and #50 (card).
The lower bar graph is the daily sales numbers. Sadly, these are not per-100 or per-1000. This game has been selling between 0 and 7 copies a day for the past three months. I've overlaid the chart position line, so you can see the two graphs do line up fairly well.
And now to the sad state of things:
If an app sells only 7 copies per day (earning the developer ~$4.85 if it is a .99 app as this is) it can comfortably live in the top 50 on the paid app charts for Card Games and/or Casino Games. And all the apps on the charts in positions lower than 50 in these categories are selling LESS THAN 7 COPIES PER DAY. And there are thousands upon thousands of card game and casino game apps that are not on the charts at all and haven't been for months/years. Those apps are selling nothing. Absolutely nothing.
Recently (May 8, 2014), our Home Poker Tournament Timer (that works great but has not been updated in a long time and does not even support retina display.) popped onto the Card Game charts at #161. It sold 1 copy that day. It had sold 1 copy per day for 4 of the previous 5 days, which may have built up some 'momentum' if you can call it that.
Apple is going to trot out big numbers about how many billions of dollars developers are being paid. That may be true if you're part of the CandyBirdZombieClan, but it isn't the case for the rest of us. The truth is that people aren't buying apps anymore. If you've been using your iPhone and iPad for more than a few years, you already have everything you need.
Here's something to think about: In the past 12 months, have you spent more or less money on apps than the previous 12 months? And how about the 12 months before that? If you didn't buy some big-ticket item (Sat.Nav. etc) then you probably spend less and less on Apps each year you own an iOS device. That is true for EVERYONE! And most everyone who wants an iOS device has already had one for several years.
Apple gets to sell you a shiny new phone every year or two, but the 'free App updates forever' policy means we only get to sell you our shiny new App once ever.
I wonder what would happen if you didn't count the 200 apps on the 'top grossing' list in the 'big number' of how much App Developers were earning. Take out those 200 and the pile is a lot smaller for the other million of us.
It sucks to be one of the 99% of App Developers right now. It really does suck.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)